RGL’s Near Wellbore Physics Testing & Sand Control Design Group: proLAB^™

What is proLAB?

RGL’s proLAB is an elite technical team dedicated to developing successful completions by focusing on near wellbore conditions and sand control strategies for optimized production. RGL’s proLAB includes sand control and near wellbore physics experts with diverse industrial and academic background including physical modelling and experimental testing, petroleum geomechanics, rock mechanics and geotechnics.

Why proLAB?

Quick and cost-effective testing
Reliable and repeatable results
Increased confidence in engineering design and product selection
Potential to reduce operating costs and extend the life of the well
Full duplication of the Particle Sand Distribution (PSD), clay content, mineralogy, reservoir fluid chemistry, and liner geometry
Tailored Sand Control Device (SCD) to specific reservoir conditions
Test multiple sand control screens and specifications against our historical database and in-house design software
Test multiple flow rates
State-of-the-art, industry recognized facility
Industry leader in sand control engineering

What Does proLAB Offer?

RGL’s proLAB offers a three-phase sand control design and testing program (Fig. 1). This program seeks to evaluate SCD designs for PSD variations of a studied field, utilizing improved sand control testing methodologies.

Fig. 1: RGL’s sand control design workflow.

How Does Industry Benefit from proLAB?

Based on the results of RGL’s sand control design and testing program, which consider reservoir complexity and fluid parameters, we confidently design an optimum sand control solution for the well.

What are the proLAB™ Sand Control Evaluation Tests?

RGL’s proLAB provides services for sand characterization and screen evaluation. The main services for sand characterization are:

Soxhlet Extraction: This specially modified and equipped unit cleans core samples for characterization in PHASE 1 and sand control evaluation in PHASE 2.
Sonic Sifting PSD Analysis: This analysis provides the PSD using the sieving method according to the ASTM standards.
Dynamic Image Analysis (DIA): This analysis measures the shape and particle size using pioneer QICPIC equipment.
Coulter Counter Analysis: This equipment measures the size of suspended particles down to clay size.
Unlike common industry practice, proLAB considers the full particle shape and size analysis for all ranges of sand, fines, and clay for testing and SCD design.

The proposed sand control design by RGL’s screen design model in PHASE 1, and any proposed SCD by the client, are tested in our state-of-the-art experimental facility. RGL’s proLAB has developed different state-of-the-art and pioneer types of sand retention testing facilities. Developed facilities are explained here:

Linear flow standalone completion testing: This setup simulates the near wellbore condition for sand control evaluation purposes. It could simulate different types of completions such as standalone screen, gravel-pack, cased, and perforated with standalone screen (Fig. 2). standalone completion testing simulates both injection and production scenarios under multiphase flow condition. Testing the large-scale disk coupons and sandpacks helps to minimize the size-related errors in comparison with single-slot coupon tests. High-Pressure and High-Temperature (HP/HT) conditions could be considered to better simulate the temperature-related near wellbore phenomena. Solvent injection could be also included in standalone completion testing. The solvent is injected along with oil and brine. The temperature at the sand-trap (below the screen), can be adjusted to simulate the flashing across the screen. The solvent assisted in-situ process poses a higher challenge to the SCD due to the potential of solvent flashing in the vicinity of the sand screen. Modified standalone completion testing for the operations that use solvent standalone completion testing involves a modified testing protocol, which allows flow of the mixed bitumen solvent at various rates at desired temperatures up to 90⁰C and controlled backpressure up to 1000 kPa. The drop in the backpressure induces the flashing of the solvent in the vicinity of the SCD. Modified standalone completion testing for the operations that use solvent standalone completion testing involves a modified testing protocol, which allows flow of the mixed bitumen solvent at various rates at desired temperatures up to 90⁰C and controlled backpressure up to 1000 kPa. The drop in the backpressure induces the flashing of the solvent in the vicinity of the SCD. Large-scale standalone completion testing is unique equipment for RGL. The development procedure and results using RGL’s standalone completion testing have been vastly published (SPE-190125-MS, SPE-189766-MS, SPE-189539-MS, SPE-189557-MS, SPE-193697-MS, SPE-189769-MS, SPE- 193375-MS, SPE-184999-MS, SPE-182517-MS, SPE-180756-MS).

Figs. 2a through 2f—Linear standalone completion testing rigs.

Dead-end Filtration Test: In addition to pre-pack standalone completion tests (Fig. 2), slurry standalone completion tests (Fig. 3) are available through proLAB. Dead-end filtration testing is specifically designed to evaluate the plugging tendency and flow performance of the mesh screens under different flow rates, fluid viscosity, solid concentration, and particle size. Development of the apparatus and testing results were published (SPE-198056-MS).

Fig. 3: Slurry standalone completion testing rigs.

Radial flow standalone completion testing: This test is designed to simulate the near wellbore condition under radial flow condition. Standalone screen, cased, and perforated with standalone screen can be simulated with this facility (Fig. 4). Development of the apparatus and testing results were published (SPE-199239-MS). Later, due to the increasing interest of operators working at High-Pressure-High-Temperature (HPHT) condition, a new version of the standalone completion test was designed as shown in Fig. 5 to cover the requirements of the thermal projects.

Fig. 4: Radial standalone completion testing rigs.

Fig. 5: High pressure/high temperature testing rig.

Wellbore Simulator: This setup is designed to simulate tubing deployed devices (such as scab liner completion on the tubing (Fig. 6) and nozzles). The large-scale flow loop with real casing and tubing size provides a thorough understanding of the tubing deployed device’s performance. The wellbore simulator is a unique equipment, which was developed through a collaboration with a major operator in Canada (SPE-193366-MS).

Fig. 6: Wellbore simulator rig.

Screen Erosion Testing: This setup (Fig. 7) is designed to simulate the erosion at well condition. Different sizes of the screen coupon can be tested in a specifically designed rig for assessing the erosion resistivity of the screen material under different flow rates and particle hardness. Tested screen samples are later scanned to measure the eroded surface.

Fig. 7: Screen erosion testing rig.

Standalone completion testing and wellbore simulator experiments are performed at different flow rates with single phase, two phase and three-phase fluid composition (Fig. 8). Standalone completion testing and wellbore simulator measure sand production (Fig. 9) and pressure drop across the screen and near liner formation (Fig. 10) for all SCDs of varying aperture sizes suggested by the RGL screen design model. Based on the information, corrosion/scaling/erosion and mechanical considerations, proLAB provides customers with an optimized SCD.

In addition to novel standalone completion testing, the single slot testing, which is the historically used single-slot coupon test for slotted liner, is also provided by proLAB. However, this test can be run for other SCD types and due to the small amount of sand material required, can be performed using original core samples. If available, core samples can be used for standalone completion testing.

Fig. 8: Single-phase, two-phase, and three-phase testing procedure.

Fig. 9: Graph of the produced sand for a specific PSD, for different SCDs with different ASs (Aperture Size).

Fig. 10: Graph of the pressure drops for a specific PSD, for different SCDs with different ASs (Aperture Size).

Table below provides a list of the proLAB services: